<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toronto Sports Media Circling Maple Leafs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torontosportsmedia.com/toronto-maple-leafs-hockey/toronto-sports-media-circling/6734/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torontosportsmedia.com/toronto-maple-leafs-hockey/toronto-sports-media-circling/6734</link>
	<description>Keeping an eye on the daily beat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:03:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jackmac</title>
		<link>http://torontosportsmedia.com/toronto-maple-leafs-hockey/toronto-sports-media-circling/6734/comment-page-1#comment-5611</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torontosportsmedia.com/?p=6734#comment-5611</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t buy the &quot;playoff appearances&quot; argument presented early in the article.  In the 21 team era (1979-91) it was difficult to MISS the playoffs - witness some of the point totals of Leafs teams that made the postseason in that era.  In the 18/17 team era (1974-79), the top 3 teams in each division made the playoffs.  The Leafs had some decent squads in that period, but they also benefited from the presence of the dreadful Seals/Barons franchise in their 4 team division.  Bottom line, 70 points (5 games under .500) pretty much guaranteed a playoff spot in the past, in the 3-point game era today, its 92-93 (i.e.: minimum 5 games over .500)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t buy the &#8220;playoff appearances&#8221; argument presented early in the article.  In the 21 team era (1979-91) it was difficult to MISS the playoffs &#8211; witness some of the point totals of Leafs teams that made the postseason in that era.  In the 18/17 team era (1974-79), the top 3 teams in each division made the playoffs.  The Leafs had some decent squads in that period, but they also benefited from the presence of the dreadful Seals/Barons franchise in their 4 team division.  Bottom line, 70 points (5 games under .500) pretty much guaranteed a playoff spot in the past, in the 3-point game era today, its 92-93 (i.e.: minimum 5 games over .500)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eggbert</title>
		<link>http://torontosportsmedia.com/toronto-maple-leafs-hockey/toronto-sports-media-circling/6734/comment-page-1#comment-5604</link>
		<dc:creator>Eggbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torontosportsmedia.com/?p=6734#comment-5604</guid>
		<description>All bullshit aside, this team has played well enough to win probably 8 of their last 6.We need finishers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All bullshit aside, this team has played well enough to win probably 8 of their last 6.We need finishers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueBuds</title>
		<link>http://torontosportsmedia.com/toronto-maple-leafs-hockey/toronto-sports-media-circling/6734/comment-page-1#comment-5603</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueBuds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torontosportsmedia.com/?p=6734#comment-5603</guid>
		<description>&quot;the fan base has the stomach to go the right route. Burke elected not to go that way. He didn’t break the whole thing down and go with kids&quot; 

I&#039;m sorry but isn&#039;t this comment 100% contradiction? I understand the concept of going with youth but shouldn&#039;t they do that when the youth is ready for the show? What kind of management would throw kids who are unproven to play against talent level they never played with? I don&#039;t know about you but having the stomach means dealing with the time it takes for kids to properly develop in the AHL before jumping to the NHL, not lets watch these kids get slaughtered every night but they&#039;ll learn to adapt mentality. I&#039;m sorry but exposing kids to the crap that is this team and losing is not what I would want to be exposed to. These kids need time in the AHL to develop and not rushed into the big show to only ultimately fail. That is what stomaching really means and clearly there are many fans and MSM reporters fail to recognize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the fan base has the stomach to go the right route. Burke elected not to go that way. He didn’t break the whole thing down and go with kids&#8221; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry but isn&#8217;t this comment 100% contradiction? I understand the concept of going with youth but shouldn&#8217;t they do that when the youth is ready for the show? What kind of management would throw kids who are unproven to play against talent level they never played with? I don&#8217;t know about you but having the stomach means dealing with the time it takes for kids to properly develop in the AHL before jumping to the NHL, not lets watch these kids get slaughtered every night but they&#8217;ll learn to adapt mentality. I&#8217;m sorry but exposing kids to the crap that is this team and losing is not what I would want to be exposed to. These kids need time in the AHL to develop and not rushed into the big show to only ultimately fail. That is what stomaching really means and clearly there are many fans and MSM reporters fail to recognize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://torontosportsmedia.com/toronto-maple-leafs-hockey/toronto-sports-media-circling/6734/comment-page-1#comment-5602</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torontosportsmedia.com/?p=6734#comment-5602</guid>
		<description>Cox also shouldn&#039;t be arguing that Burke&#039;s first 2 years in Vancouer were worse.  He was hired in 1998.

The Canucks &#039;98-&#039;99 season saw them finish 23-47-12 for 58 points.  In &#039;99-&#039;00 they ended up 30-29-15-8 for 83 points.

Unless Cox is including the &#039;97-&#039;98 season I&#039;m not sure how the comment makes any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cox also shouldn&#8217;t be arguing that Burke&#8217;s first 2 years in Vancouer were worse.  He was hired in 1998.</p>
<p>The Canucks &#8216;98-&#8217;99 season saw them finish 23-47-12 for 58 points.  In &#8216;99-&#8217;00 they ended up 30-29-15-8 for 83 points.</p>
<p>Unless Cox is including the &#8216;97-&#8217;98 season I&#8217;m not sure how the comment makes any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://torontosportsmedia.com/toronto-maple-leafs-hockey/toronto-sports-media-circling/6734/comment-page-1#comment-5601</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torontosportsmedia.com/?p=6734#comment-5601</guid>
		<description>While I understand the nature of most of the articles written by the MSM over the past few days (prior to the Washington win - which wasn&#039;t as great as the media is pretending) - I have a bit of a problem with people toasting the Toronto Sun writings as great reporting.

To wit:


&quot;” After the last-second blowing of the Carolina Hurricanes game, Wilson said, in his usual caustic way: “We need more commitment from some people who are feeling sorry for themselves.”

Yet it was him who had a minus-five Nikolai Kulemin on the ice to help blow it.

Perhaps Wilson should be sent to the minors.&quot;

Nikolai Kulemin wasn&#039;t a -5 on the night in question.  He was even, INCLUDING the goal scored to tie the game.  He had 2 assists, and was one of the best players for the leafs during the game.

He&#039;s a -5 on the season, but then Rickard Wallin is -5, Lee Stempniak is -6, and Matt Stajan is -7... somehow I doubt that would be a trio the writer would object to as being on the ice in the final minute for this Leafs group.

Mikhail Grabovski is -3, Jason Blake is -2, and Phil Kessel is +2, so is the argument that they would have been better choices to be on the ice with the game on the line?  I don&#039;t really think so.

Arguing that Ron Wilson is a bad coach because the team blows a lead they capture with 36 seconds remaining in the game, is a bit beyond the pale frankly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I understand the nature of most of the articles written by the MSM over the past few days (prior to the Washington win &#8211; which wasn&#8217;t as great as the media is pretending) &#8211; I have a bit of a problem with people toasting the Toronto Sun writings as great reporting.</p>
<p>To wit:</p>
<p>&#8220;” After the last-second blowing of the Carolina Hurricanes game, Wilson said, in his usual caustic way: “We need more commitment from some people who are feeling sorry for themselves.”</p>
<p>Yet it was him who had a minus-five Nikolai Kulemin on the ice to help blow it.</p>
<p>Perhaps Wilson should be sent to the minors.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nikolai Kulemin wasn&#8217;t a -5 on the night in question.  He was even, INCLUDING the goal scored to tie the game.  He had 2 assists, and was one of the best players for the leafs during the game.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s a -5 on the season, but then Rickard Wallin is -5, Lee Stempniak is -6, and Matt Stajan is -7&#8230; somehow I doubt that would be a trio the writer would object to as being on the ice in the final minute for this Leafs group.</p>
<p>Mikhail Grabovski is -3, Jason Blake is -2, and Phil Kessel is +2, so is the argument that they would have been better choices to be on the ice with the game on the line?  I don&#8217;t really think so.</p>
<p>Arguing that Ron Wilson is a bad coach because the team blows a lead they capture with 36 seconds remaining in the game, is a bit beyond the pale frankly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kohma</title>
		<link>http://torontosportsmedia.com/toronto-maple-leafs-hockey/toronto-sports-media-circling/6734/comment-page-1#comment-5599</link>
		<dc:creator>Kohma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torontosportsmedia.com/?p=6734#comment-5599</guid>
		<description>kept him *alive* while he played!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kept him *alive* while he played!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kohma</title>
		<link>http://torontosportsmedia.com/toronto-maple-leafs-hockey/toronto-sports-media-circling/6734/comment-page-1#comment-5598</link>
		<dc:creator>Kohma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torontosportsmedia.com/?p=6734#comment-5598</guid>
		<description>Fantastic Post. 

&quot;Interestingly, Gretzky shares Burke’s philosophy on the need for toughness in the sport and enforcers on the ice.&quot; Yeah, they kept him while he played!

&quot;Burke elected not to go that way. He didn’t break the whole thing down and go with kids, he went a non -traditional route of being half pregnant.&quot; Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic Post. </p>
<p>&#8220;Interestingly, Gretzky shares Burke’s philosophy on the need for toughness in the sport and enforcers on the ice.&#8221; Yeah, they kept him while he played!</p>
<p>&#8220;Burke elected not to go that way. He didn’t break the whole thing down and go with kids, he went a non -traditional route of being half pregnant.&#8221; Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunday Journal- November 22, 2009 : Sports Media Journal</title>
		<link>http://torontosportsmedia.com/toronto-maple-leafs-hockey/toronto-sports-media-circling/6734/comment-page-1#comment-5596</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunday Journal- November 22, 2009 : Sports Media Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torontosportsmedia.com/?p=6734#comment-5596</guid>
		<description>[...] Toronto Sports Media looks at what reporters have been writing about the Maple Leafs&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Toronto Sports Media looks at what reporters have been writing about the Maple Leafs&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://torontosportsmedia.com/toronto-maple-leafs-hockey/toronto-sports-media-circling/6734/comment-page-1#comment-5592</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torontosportsmedia.com/?p=6734#comment-5592</guid>
		<description>Hey TSM, this story came up on google news!  Congrats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey TSM, this story came up on google news!  Congrats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerard</title>
		<link>http://torontosportsmedia.com/toronto-maple-leafs-hockey/toronto-sports-media-circling/6734/comment-page-1#comment-5591</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torontosportsmedia.com/?p=6734#comment-5591</guid>
		<description>Shoalts has been reading the comment boards on the fan blogs.   That part of his article was a basic generalization of the comments on nearly every article over on MLHS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shoalts has been reading the comment boards on the fan blogs.   That part of his article was a basic generalization of the comments on nearly every article over on MLHS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
